Repo authority
README, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Copilot instructions, docs, and `.agent/` files define the portable working contract.
It does not replace Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or Copilot. It gives them a structured repo map, current state, review guidance, validation expectations, and continuity artifacts before they start spending context.
The repository stays the source of truth. The CLI and desktop app read the same repo-local contract.
When an agent starts in a real repo without a working set, authority order, phase state, or validation map, it has to discover all of that with expensive broad reads. Kiwi Control makes those answers explicit and inspectable.
README, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Copilot instructions, docs, and `.agent/` files define the portable working contract.
`packages/sj-core` derives context, graph artifacts, review packs, workflow state, checks, and token guidance.
`packages/sj-cli` exposes the engine through `kc status`, `guide`, `graph`, `pack`, `review`, and `check`.
`apps/sj-ui` is a Tauri app that visualizes the same repo-local state and runtime bridge output.
Kiwi Control reads repo authority, classifies project shape, selects context within a budget, and records active role hints so an agent can start with a practical map instead of raw discovery.
Review and graph outputs turn the current repo state into concrete files, modules, validations, and next steps. The agent still reasons, but it has fewer blind alleys.
Kiwi Control helps agents avoid repeated rediscovery by making repo authority, selected files, graph hints, validation expectations, and handoff state explicit. The measured proof shows this helped on one controlled task. It is not a guarantee for every repo or every model.
Context selection ranks files before an agent reads broad sections of the repo.
Checkpoints, handoffs, and current-focus state preserve continuity across interruptions.
Review packs and checks push attention toward risk and validation before a patch grows sideways.
No. Kiwi Control is a control plane. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, or a human still perform the implementation work.
No. It is designed to give those tools structured repo context and continuity before they start work.
It narrows the initial working set, preserves handoff state, and points review toward risky files. The public proof is one controlled measured run, not a universal benchmark.
Yes. The durable contract lives inside the repository, primarily under `.agent/`, with CLI and desktop surfaces reading that state.
Installer signing trust is release-specific, Homebrew and winget are not live install paths, and some usage/advisory views depend on local tool availability.
Use GitHub for reproducible issues, LinkedIn for direct product questions, or email Shrey if you need a deeper architecture conversation.